Courts Martial

Decision Information

Dilello M.A. (Sergeant), R. v.

Collection Courts Martial
Date 2008-06-11
Neutral citation 2008 CM 2020
Docket 200823
Judge P.J. Lamont
Decision type Finding
Decision status Available
Type of Court Martial Disciplinary Court Martial
Notes

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Summary:

Date de l'ouverture du procès : 9 juin 2008

Endroit : 22e Escadre North Bay, Édifice 33, 2e étage, 33 rue Manston, Hornell Heights (ON).

Chefs d'accusation
•Chefs d'accusation 1, 2 : Art. 130 LDN, a proféré des menaces (art. 264.1 C. cr.).
•Chef d'accusation 3 : Art. 95 LDN, a frappé une personne qui en raison de son grade lui était subordonnée.

Résultats
•Verdicts : Chefs d'accusation 1, 2, 3 : Non coupable.

Disciplinary Court Martial (DCM) (composed of a military judge and a panel of three members)

Note:
Panel members of a Disciplinary Court Martial are required to provide the applicable findings to the case exclusively. Accordingly, court martial members do not provide any reasons for their findings.

Decision Content

Citation: R. v.  Sergeant M.A. Dilello, 2008 CM 2020

 

Docket: 200823                                                                                 

 

 

 

DISCIPLINARY COURT MARTIAL                             

CANADA

ONTARIO

CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY                  

 

Date: 11 June 2008

 

PRESIDING: COMMANDER P.J. LAMONT, M.J.

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

v.                                                                                

SERGEANT M.A. DILELLO

(Accused)

 

RECORD OF DECISION OF THE COURT

(Rendered orally)

 

 

The panel of the Disciplinary Court Martial of Sergeant M.A. Dilello, held at Canadian Forces Base North Bay, Ontario, from 9 to 11 June 2008, returned a verdict of not guilty to charge number two and charge number three on the charge sheet.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.